(3) In accordance with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, an application was submitted for the renewal of the authorisation of the preparation of Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 for chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying and minor poultry species except for laying purposes, including for a modification of the minimum concentration of the active agent in the preparation. In accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, another application was submitted for a new use of that preparation for ornamental birds, sporting and game birds. Those applications requested that additive to be classified in the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’ and the functional group ‘gut flora stabilisers’ and were accompanied by the particulars and documents required respectively under Article 14(2) and Article 7(3) of that Regulation.

(4) In accordance with Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, an application was submitted for the modification of the terms of the authorisation of the preparation of Bacillus subtilis ATCC PTA-6737 as laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 306/2013, Implementing Regulation (EU) No 787/2013, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1020 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2276, in relation to the change of the name of the additive from Bacillus subtilis ATCC PTA-6737 to Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737, as regards the strain taxonomy. That application was accompanied by the relevant data supporting the request for change, as required by Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

(5) The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 30 September 2020 (8) that the applicant has provided evidence that the preparation of Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 remains safe for chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying and minor poultry species (except for laying purposes), consumers and the environment, taking notably into consideration the modification of the minimum concentration of the active agent in the preparation. It also concluded that the preparation is non-irritant to skin and eyes and is not a dermal sensitiser. In addition, the Authority concluded that the preparation has the potential to be efficacious as a zootechnical additive for ornamental, sporting and game birds. The Authority does not consider that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring.

(6) In its opinion of 23 March 2022, the Authority concluded that the additive should be taxonomically designated as Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737. It further concluded that the additive is not a dermal or eye irritant or a skin sensitiser but should be considered a respiratory sensitiser.

(7) In accordance with Article 5(4), points (a), (b) and (c) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 378/2005, the Reference Laboratory set up by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 considered that the conclusions and recommendations reached in the previous assessment are applicable for the current applications.

(8) The assessment of the preparation of Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied. As for ducks for fattening, quails, pheasants, partridges, guinea fowl, pigeons, geese for fattening and ostriches, game and sporting birds should be considered as minor poultry species and should therefore be included in the scope of the renewal of authorisation. Accordingly, the authorisation of that additive should be renewed for chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying and minor poultry species except for laying purposes and the use of that additive should be authorised for ornamental birds.

(9) The Commission considers that appropriate protective measures should be taken to prevent adverse effects on human health, in particular as regards the users of the additive. Those protective measures should comply with Union legislation on worker safety requirements.

(10) The name of the additive should be taxonomically designated as Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 306/2013, Implementing Regulation (EU) No 787/2013, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1020 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2276 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(11) As a consequence of the renewal of the authorisation of the preparation of Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 as a feed additive, Regulation (EU) No 107/2010 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 885/2011 should be repealed.

(12) Since safety reasons do not require the immediate application of the modifications to the conditions of authorisation of the preparation of Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737, it is appropriate to provide for a transitional period for interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements resulting from the renewal of the authorisation and from the change of the name of the additive.

(13) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,