(Under forberedelse) Delegert kommisjonsforordning (EU) .../... om utfylling av europaparlaments- og rådsforordning (EU) nr. 575/2013 med hensyn til tekniske reguleringsstandarder for spesifisering av naturen, alvorlighetsgraden og varigheten av en økonomisk nedtur i samsvar med artikkel 181 punkt 3(a) og artikkel 182 punkt 4(a) til forordning (EU) nr. 575/2013
(Under development) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) .../... supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 with regard to regulatory technical standards on the specification of the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn in accordance with Articles 181(3)(a) and 182(4)(a) of Regulation (EU) nr. 575/2013
Rapport med utkast til kommisjonsforordning vedtatt og sendt til Kommisjonen av Den europeiske banktilsynsmyndighet (EBA) 16.11.2018
BAKGRUNN (fra EBAs pressemelding 16.11.2018)
EBA publishes final draft technical standards on the specification of an economic downturn
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published today its final draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) specifying the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn. These RTS complete the EBA's regulatory review of the internal ratings-based (IRB) Approach, with the objective of restoring market participants' trust in internal models by reducing the unjustified variability in resulting risk weighted exposure amounts. The EBA is currently finalising the related Guidelines on the estimation of loss given default (LGD) appropriate for conditions of an economic downturn.
The final draft RTS set out the notion of economic downturn to be taken into account when estimating the LGD and the conversion factors (CF). Given the specificities of the types of exposures covered by a rating system, the economic downturn should be identified separately for each rating system. However, as a rating system may cover exposures from different businesses, sectors and geographical areas, the notion of an economic downturn included in these RTS may comprise several disjunctive downturn periods (e.g. where a rating system covers two sectors which experienced downturn conditions in different periods of time).
In addition, the final draft RTS specify the nature of an economic downturn via macroeconomic or credit-related factors (‘economic factors') that are explanatory variables or indicators for the business cycle of the considered type of exposure. The severity of an economic downturn is specified by the set of the most severe observations on the economic factors constituting the nature of an economic downturn, based on historical values of these factors over the last 20 years. The duration of an economic downturn is determined by the duration of the identified downturn periods and is generally specified as the 12-month period where the most severe values are observed. However, some flexibility is embedded in the draft policy to ensure that the severity and duration are appropriately specified.
Legal basis, implementation and next steps
Under the advanced IRB Approach, institutions determine their own funds requirements for credit risk taking into account their own LGD and CF estimates. According to Article 181(1)(b) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), institutions shall estimate LGDs that are appropriate for an economic downturn and according to Article 182 (1)(b) institutions shall estimate conversion factors that are appropriate for an economic downturn.
Therefore, the EBA is mandated in Articles 181(3)(a) and 182(4)(a) to develop these draft RTS specifying the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn to be taken into account when estimating the LGD and CF.
These draft RTS will apply from 1 January 2021. It should be noted that the Guidelines on the estimation of the probability of default (PD) and LGD, which will be complemented by the Guidelines on downturn LGD estimation, will apply as well from 1 January 2021. An earlier implementation of the Guidelines on downturn LGD estimation is, however, encouraged and Institutions should engage with their competent authorities at an early stage in order to determine an adequate implementation plan, including the timeline for the supervisory assessment and approval of material model changes, where necessary.